In our newest "how can we help you?" thread, a reader asks:
I am curious what the norms/conventions are for reporting your affiliation when changing jobs. For example, I currently work at institution A but am starting a new job in the fall at institution B. When writing down my affiliation—e.g., when submitting to journals or conferences, or filling out a form about how my affiliation on a conference programme—should I write down A, B, A/B (as I’ve sometimes seen), etc.?
Another reader had the same question ("I have the same question as A/B. Should I write down my future affiliation in my current submission?"). I'm not exactly sure what the conventions are, but I guess I'm inclined to say that it might depend on which institution you'll be at when the event rolls around. Will you still be at School A if/when you attend the conference? If not, then it might be a bit confusing to other participants. And I guess I think the same thing probably applies to journals. Maybe list A when submitting, but if the paper is accepted and will be published when you're at B, update your proofs to list B instead?
Anyway, these are just my thoughts. What are yours?
For publications, I think what matters is the affiliation at the time of acceptance (though for tenure purposes, you might be able to go with time of publication).
For conferences, it really doesn't matter, so I'd say it's the affiliation at time of submission. You can change it for your nametag once you register.
Posted by: Michel | 03/17/2023 at 03:24 PM