In our July "how can we help you?" thread, Tom asks:
I am investigating a philosopher's intellectual history. A particular university archive (whom I am working with) restricts access to this deceased philosopher's records for 80 years after their attendance, but this person's records are only 70 years old now. This information would be very useful for me, but I would have to wait another 10 years, therefore postponing my progress significantly. These situations vary by institution, but does anyone have any advice on dealing with archives who keep their 70 year old records very highly protected? Would it be unreasonable to try to petition them to grant an exception? All people involved have been dead over 30 years now, so there don't seem to be any ethical issues. However, I also don't want to be a bother or to cause trouble. Thanks, Marcus!
This is an interesting query, but sadly I know nothing about this kind of stuff. It would be great to hear from historians who work with archival records on how you handle these kinds of situations. What options are available to Tom?
A few options come to mind. It can't hurt to ask the head of the collection about this. Explain your credentials and project. If the initial reply is no, you could ask to look at the material but only use it with specific permission for each piece of info. (It probably isn't the philosophy part that they want to embargo, right?) If that doesn't work, just plan to publish a "new and updated!" 2nd edition in about 11 years!
Posted by: Bill Vanderburgh | 07/19/2022 at 03:13 PM