In our newest "how can we help you?" thread, a reader asks:
How bad is it to not have a teaching letter, in R1 positions? While I do teach, and haven't heard any complaints yet, I have almost exclusively done so as sole instructor, and the only senior person at my institution who has actually seen me teach is affiliated in the same research project as me. I worry that if I told her I'm applying elsewhere, she wouldn't take it well.
Connected question: how are letters from non-philosophers received? Are they useless? Say, a letter from a psychology professor who really likes your work on perception?
Good questions! I don't know about the first one, as I don't work at an R1. But, in response to the other questions, I'm inclined to think that a letter from a non-philosopher may be fine. A non-philosopher might not be well-positioned to discuss your understanding of philosophy per se (though if they work on the same research project as you, they might!). However, they can probably speak to a lot other, more general aspects of teaching that hiring committees are likely to care about, which is how you engage with students, run in-class discussions, how clear and well-organized your lectures are, the kinds of assignments you give, and so on.
But these are just my thoughts. What are yours? It could be especially helpful to hear from people who have served on hiring committees. What do you think?
If the ad requests it, you must have it. If it is the norm though not specifically requested, committees may wonder why you don't have it and assume the worst.
If you think you would not get strong teaching letters from current departmental colleagues (because they would be disappointed you are considering leaving or for other reasons), try to find someone from a conceptually-neighboring discipline who can look at your teaching materials, discuss your teaching philosophy with you, and visit a class.
Posted by: William Vanderburgh | 09/09/2021 at 06:17 PM