In our newest "how can we help you?" thread, a reader writes:
I am consistently getting 1 or 2 interviews a year but I cannot seem to get over the hump, so to speak, to the on-campus phase. I am going on 3 years removed from PhD. I have a non-TT position that is fairly stable but somewhat unsatisfying. Does anyone else have this experience and if so, what would you recommend?
This is a very good question. I had a similar experience. My first three years or so on the job-market were similar. I got one or two TT interviews each year, but had trouble converting them into on-campus visits. I started to worry about 'going stale', and asked several senior mentors for advice. Their advice was to keep publishing and otherwise improving my CV (viz. teaching experience, service, etc.). It ended up working. My number of first-round interviews began climbing each year, as did my number of on-campus visits. I ultimately ended up getting a tenure-track job 7 years post-PhD, in what was likely my final year on the market (as my non-TT job at the time had a 7 year maximum). I'm not sure that sticking it out as long as I did is good advice for everyone, as it was a miserable seven years and I ended up lucking out at the last minute. But, for what it is worth, the advice I received worked: the more that I published, and the more than I improved my teaching and service record, the more interviews I got.
Second, although there can be all sorts of reasons why a candidate isn't converting first-round interviews into on-campus visits, it may be worth doing some mock interviews with friends or even hiring an interviewing coach--as there may be things about the way the OP interviews that come off poorly. As someone who is naturally shy and introverted (and who had a stutter as a child!), I struggle with interviews a lot. I can come across uncomfortable and nervous, and I practiced interviewing a lot with my spouse on improving. We'd do mock interviews while walking, and even by Zooming in different rooms. There are also interviewing consultants one can hire to help one improve.
Finally, I expect quite a few readers may say that given how bad the job-market is, if the OP is in a fairly unsatisfying job, it may be worth exploring some plan Bs: that is, job opportunities outside of academia. Of course, the OP didn't mention whether they are at the point yet of seriously considering non-academic jobs. But if they are unsatisfied where they are, it could potentially be worth their while to begin exploring their other options. But these are just my thoughts and experiences. What are yours?
I had four serious years on the market (100+ applications), and two selective years. I had 0-1 interiews every year save one: the year I got two interviews was the year I got my current (NTT but stable) job.
I think it's just a pretty normal pattern, especially outside the more in-demand AOSes. Most of the people I know who have scored TT jobs went 0-1 or 1-2 interviews a year for years, and eventually one of those interviews yielded the job.
I don't have any advice on 'getting over the hump' and converting the interviews into a job, but perhaps I can reassure the OP that the pattern seems normal to me, given what I've seen and heard. Just getting an interview is a victory, and getting them consistently is fantastic.
Posted by: Michel | 02/08/2021 at 01:49 PM
I agree with Michel: I don't think you should take only getting 1 or 2 interviews a year as a sign that you aren't doing well on the market. My first year on the market was the 2014-2015 academic year. I earned a TT job in 2019. In none of those years did I have more than 2 interviews. Most of my friends in my subfield tell similar stories. I strongly expect that in today's market, 1 or 2 interviews a year means you're exceptionally competitive, and that it's probably a matter of sticking it out. I also strongly expect that the days of people other than those at the very very tippy top getting more than a few interviews per cycle are over.
Marcus: I clearly recall you saying things in the past about how, if you're doing it right, you should get lots of interviews. I'm curious to know if you still think this. (Of course clearly more interviews=more right, but I think it's 100% clear that the balance has changed from when you were on the market. I mean, I think it's clear it's changed dramatically from when *I* was on the market.)
Posted by: ttj | 02/08/2021 at 04:02 PM
Can I ask roughly how many publications you had when you finally landed your tenure-track job 7 years post-PhD? (Same question goes for anyone else who landed a TT job after a number of years on the market.)
I completed my PHD without any publications, and I've been playing catchup the last couple of years, trying improve my CV. I'm aiming for at least 1-2 articles in well-respected journals per year, and I'm wondering whether that's enough to stay competitive. I know a lot depends on the specific job one is applying for, but it would be nice to get a better sense for the ballpark publication numbers of people who land TT jobs.
Posted by: TM | 02/08/2021 at 04:09 PM
Hi TM: Sure thing. Here's what my path looked like. I first went on the market in 2007 while ABD. Like you, I received my PhD with no publications, and it took me a few years to find my stride with publishing. My first year, I got a research postdoc. The next year, 2008, the Recession hit and the job market tanked. I got no TT interviews, but took a renewable VAP at a teaching-focused university in the US so that I could live with my spouse. The next several years, I didn't get many interviews. There were a few years in a row that I got either 0 or 1 TT interview, and like I said in the OP I was worried that I was going stale. In fact, I was so dispirited by the market that I took a year off my job-search (in 2012 I think) to focus on improving my dossier. I didn't start to do well on the market until 2013 or 2014, when I started publishing more.
I started to do better on the market the more that I published. In 2013 (my 5th year post-PhD), I published 4 articles and think I got something like 3 TT interviews. In 2014, I published 5 articles. That was my second-to-last year on the market, and by that I point I had 13 journal publications. I believe I got 7 TT interviews that year, along with several flyouts. The next year (2015) was my final year on the market, and by that time I added one more article in a good journal and had my first book under contract with a pretty good press. I got 12 or 13 TT interviews that year, a bunch of flyouts, and several offers.
This was a while ago now (the market is even worse now than it was then), and I may not be very representative (among other things, I work in an area--ethics--where there are a lot of jobs each year). But it was nice to see publishing and improving the other parts of my dossier seem to pay off.
Anyway, long story short, my experience is that 1-2 publications a year may keep you competitive, but since a lot of candidates publish about at that rate, it may be a good idea to try to publish significantly more than that. For what it is worth, I think this is doable if you're not shooting for top-ranked journals. I wasn't much concerned about publishing in top journals, for reasons I've discussed on this blog before (I wasn't much in line for a job at an R1 after a few years on the market, I needed to publish quickly rather than endure 90%+ rejection rates, and my clear sense is that non-R1s care a lot less about things like journal rankings than people tend to think). It sucks that this is what the market has come to (trying to 'overpublish' your way into a job), but as they say, it is what it is. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Posted by: Marcus Arvan | 02/08/2021 at 04:27 PM
Marcus: That's very helpful, and encouraging. I made the mistake of getting wrapped up in writing a very long article, which I hope to publish in a top journal in my field. I'm very pleased with the article, but it's taken me over a year to complete. After this, it makes sense to build my CV with some shorter articles I can produce much more quickly. Thanks again.
Posted by: TM | 02/08/2021 at 04:46 PM
This may or may not be the right place to ask this question, but I would be curious to read more about what kinds of service are specifically recommended to improve one's chances of getting a TT job. I suppose that I understand publishing and teaching as strategic CV improvers, but not service. Thanks in advance for any advice.
Posted by: serve the servants | 02/08/2021 at 10:03 PM
My TT interview count, by year on the market (Ph.D ranking between 30 and 40).
Year 1, abd: 1 (plus 4 non-TT)
Year 2, abd: 1 (plus 3 non-TT)
Year 3, at VAP: 5 (got offer)
Posted by: TT | 02/09/2021 at 09:39 AM
Servile one,
You do not need to do service in order to be considered for a job if you do not already have a TT job. So do not waste your time. I helped someone once who was having a hard time on the market. He was sending a letter implying he would be a great asset with his computers - of course he was not getting interviews. You are supposed to project an image of yourself as a peer, not as support staff.
Posted by: stop it | 02/09/2021 at 12:01 PM