Our books






Become a Fan

« Teaching in the time of COVID: what's working?, what's not? | Main | Attitudes toward co-authored papers »

09/25/2020

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

person

Philosophical Quarterly has a notable discussions section.

Grad student

PQ's website says: "We rarely accept purely exegetical articles, or discussions of articles originally published in other journals". I seem to recall reading a few reply papers there, though.

Metaphysics Grad

Acta Analytica

JB

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective may be worth looking into (although the collective has a heavy STS slant, so perhaps it won't be of much use to many analytic epistemologists). From their website:

1) We solicit replies, and promote dialogues, on articles published in the journal Social Epistemology;

2) We solicit reviews, and promote dialogues, on books and articles that address issues related to knowledge, society, science, and technology;

3) We solicit contributions to projects either developed by the community affiliated with the SERRC or by interested colleagues.

Phil Sci Grad

The journal Philosophy of Science publishes discussions somewhat regularly.

Current PhD student

Seconding for the Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective--I think they are actively trying to branch out of STS over there.

Erik Magnusson

Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy has a great Discussion Notes section that publishes replies and commentaries under 3000 words.

Nicolas Delon

THOUGHT will consider replies to papers published elsewhere, although they apply a higher standard.

Tom2

INQUIRY publishes replies, regardless of where the target of the reply was published.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Job-market reporting thread

Current Job-Market Discussion Thread

Philosophers in Industry Directory

Categories

Subscribe to the Cocoon