Our books

Become a Fan

« Against letters of recommendation | Main | How can we help you? (October 2019) »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Prof. L

I included a very truncated summary of my evaluations (like, only included the 'rate this class' question), representative comments, a narrative explanation of the evaluations, and said the full evaluations would be available on request.

I don't think it's reasonable to ask people to include their full evaluations. I've seen evaluations which comment on a professor's dress, looks, personal bearing, hygiene, sexual orientation, and so forth. Some are meant to be complementary, some helpful, some are mean-spirited. All these things are inappropriate and not something I would want to include in a dossier. Nor is it something I would want to post online on my website. I said full comments would be available on request, and listed sample or representative comments. No one every asked for the full comments, but of course I would have provided them if they had been requested, and did try to make the representative comments representative, and used the narrative to interpret those comments and talk about my response to them, things I thought I did well, things that I was committed to improving, ways I had already improved.

A search committee will see that you are hiding something if your scores are low and your selected comments are glowing. But if you have reasonably high scores and comments to match, I don't think that's a problem.

I do think it's important to include evaluations for all semesters taught. An upward trajectory will count in your favor (here I think a narrative is important), and the more recent evaluations will count more.


I agree with Prof. L, mostly - I'm less sure about their last point: that one should include evaluations for all semesters taught. If you have a lot of teaching experience, I think its OK to only include all of the last couple of years evaluations, for example. It can depend a bit on what you've taught (if you taught different courses early on, and those are the courses that the job ad is looking for, then it might be wise to include those.)

Grad Student Z

Thanks to Marcus for sharing my comment!

After reading Marcus's post, I went through my teaching dossier with the goal of presenting myself in the best light while avoiding the impression that I'm trying to hide something. Here's what I noticed:

- Eliminating comparisons to department averages made me look much better.

- My first semester teaching my own course is below average with respect to a number of items. However, for the items "overall course" and "overall instructor," line graphs help to visually emphasize that my ratings went up the following semesters (while university averages remained constant).

- I experimented with a "summary" chart (similar to Marcus's) that lists my averages with respect to various items for the three semesters that I taught my own courses. Unfortunately, that first semester brings most of my averages below the university averages. So, I decided not to include this chart. Once I've taught more courses (and my averages go up), I suspect that it will be to my advantage to include it.

My dossier currently has the following structure:

(i) Quantitate evaluations as instructor (3 courses)
(ii) Quantitative evaluations as a TA (5 courses)
(iii) Selection of unedited student comments together with a link to my website where complete evaluations can be downloaded

I'm a bit conflicted about whether to keep the TA evaluations. Most of them are above university averages with respect to almost every item, which is why I included them. On the other hand, there is a case to be made that they reinforce the impression that I am a graduate student.

Marcus wrote:

Another thing I think you can do is to just include all of your evaluations from a single very-good semester. I don't think I would balk as a search committee member at a dossier like that at all. In a sense, in may be "trying to hide something" if you only include one semester of evals, but I'm not sure it looks that way, since my sense is that it is what a lot of people do.

Would you recommend doing this even if you have good scores for more recent semesters?

My two main options appear to be (a) including complete quantitative evaluations for the three semesters that I taught my own courses (showing improvement over time) and a selection of student comments together with a link to my website or else (b) including complete quantitative evaluations for my most recent semester (all above average) together with complete student comments (mostly positive).

Grad Student Z

Prof. L mentioned including a "narrative to interpret those comments and talk about my response to them, things I thought I did well, things that I was committed to improving, ways I had already improved."

I've looked at a number of teaching dossiers, and this is my first time encountering this approach. I'm curious to hear more about it. How long is the narrative? Can someone provide a concrete example of how this might look in practice?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Job-market reporting thread

Current Job-Market Discussion Thread

Job ads crowdsourcing thread

Philosophers in Industry Directory