Reader query on reading vs. writing

In the comments section of our most recent "how can we help you?" thread, Amanda writes:

I guess this might help me in terms of understanding my own attitude toward the profession. I am curious whether most philosophers like writing or reading philosophy more? Also, I am curious whether most philosophers read things they like, or mainly read for the purposes of their own research. Either way, what percentage of the philosophy that you read do find intellectually fulfilling? 

I too am curious to hear people's answers. Here are mine...

I enjoy reading philosophy. Each day or so, I go through the new works list on philpapers to see what new things are out there. I'll then check out anything directly relevant to my research, as well as anything that looks at all interesting to me, which is usually quite a bit as I had pretty diverse interests. I also enjoy visiting book exhibits at conferences (especially the APA) to check out new books, though my funds for purchasing new books are pretty limited. More broadly--although Amanda doesn't mention this--I like to read outside of philosophy, particularly psychology and physics, both of which broadly relate to research interests of mine, though I like to read in those areas for mere curiosity as well. Personally, I think philosophy would benefit by philosophers reading outside of the discipline a bit more. At a few talks I've attended the past few years, philosophers have defended controversial views with empirical implications (for instance, in moral psychology), yet without apparently knowing much about the substantial empirical literature and hard data that exists: in some cases, data that falsifies or challenges the philosophical claims being made. To me, good research practice in philosophy--at least in areas that have empirical important--really requires reading outside of philosophy.

All that being said, while I enjoy reading, it's really writing that inspires me. I wake up most mornings itching to write, and draft quite a lot. Much of what I draft never sees the light of day: either I find during creating it that don't think it's good enough to submit to journals, or I draft it with the intention of turning back to it months or years later, and so on. I don't see this as a waste of time, any more than I think a painter or musician would see practice paintings or rehearsals a waste of time (every composition is, in my eyes, worthwhile in one way or another). For me, the real joy of doing philosophy is the act of creation: of exploring new ideas on paper, seeing how they work themselves out and in some cases don't work out (I never outline things prior to writing: I just write, finding my way through ideas as I go along: and to me, that's a big part of the fun of it--it's an act of exploration, like exploring a new land or city!). 

As for Amanda's question about the percentage of philosophy I read that I find intellectually fulfilling, I have a really hard time putting numbers to it. I would say that I read "quite a lot" of philosophy I find intellectually fulfilling, but also a significant amount that I don't. As a very rough guide, I'd say that the kind of philosophy I enjoy seems to me creative, risky, sincerely concerned with truth, and written with a distinct authorial style (there are some authors whose writing styles I just adore, Mary Beth Willard being just one person who immediately comes to mind, and Nick Riggle being another). On the other hand, the philosophy I don't enjoy as much tends to be that which strikes me as overly formulaic, needlessly technical, and seemingly focused more on narrow dialectical games with opponents. While I think this parody is too dismissive, as a general rule I prefer works that buck conventions and come across as a breath of fresh air.

But these are just my thoughts, and I am just one person. How would you all answer Amanda's questions?

Comments

[B]

I enjoy both reading and writing. These two things make my job a wonderful job for me. I do read broadly. I read in my areas of specialization - epistemology and philosophy of science. But I also read a lot of science and social science. I need to because of their relevance for my own research. I skim, and then read bits of, Science, the journal, every week. But I only really get understanding when I have to write something down. So I enjoy writing for that reason. It is how I develop my understanding. Writing though is quite difficult at times. I often discover that I do not yet understand what I thought I did. Then I go back to reading ...

[Amanda]

I think if I was just reading for enjoyment, I would well, enjoy it now. I am trying to get in the habit of reading more papers I just like. However I always feel guilty like I should be writing. Upon reflection, this doesn't make sense for a variety of reasons. But I feel this pressure to always have another paper under review, which means writing...

[Amanda]

Marcus, regarding the Philpapers list - is that only papers that people have uploaded to phil papers? I have to say I have never that site. It seems like every time I am searching for a paper and find a link to philpapers, I get the message "this paper is not archived by us." That has really turned me off to using it. Personally, I have my papers on academia and research gate but not Philpapers.

[Michel]

Given a forced choice, I prefer writing philosophy to reading it. But I enjoy reading it.

My philosophical reading is largely dictated by what I'm working on at the moment. As I'm writing on a topic, I read up on it systematically and as close to exhaustively as I can. And since the work I do crosses a number of sub-disciplines, my reading ends up being pretty widespread. If something catches my eye via PhilPapers (or gets plugged by someone I know, or if I see it on a conference program, etc.), then I'll download it and at least skim it, and file it away for future reading. When I run out of compelling topics to write on, I return to that file and read something that catches my fancy. If a book comes out that I think is of interest, I'll always read a review or two before filing it away for future reading.

I read quite a bit outside of philosophy, though. Mostly historical and science fiction, history, and popular(ish) science. Recently, I've been on a bit of a mystery and thriller kick too. I read about one fun book a week. (In the end, I read a lot more for fun than I do for work. I don't think I'll ever catch up on my "to read" file.)