Now that the deadline for submitting papers to this year's Cocoon conference has passed, I have a lot of papers that need to be reviewed. Anyone willing to help out by reviewing a paper or two? If so, please just send me an email with your CV to [email protected], along with an expression of how many papers you would be interested in reviewing. I'm not looking for comments on whatever paper(s) you review. All I'm looking for is for a quick read of the paper and a "thumbs up" or "thumbs down" verdict on its suitability for presentation at at the conference. Any volunteers? I would be very grateful!
Because review processes work best when papers are matched with reviewers with expertise in the area, here is a quick list of subjects this year's submissions are on (I will cross out subject areas listed once I have recruited reviewers - embedded bulletpoints indicate specific subject areas for specialists):
- Applied ethics
- Arendt
- Consequentialism
- Deontology
- Epistemology
- Credence
- Definitions of knowledge
- Formal epistemology
- Luminosity
- Grounding
- Heidegger
- Inference to the best explanation
- The language of thought
- Metaethics (moral realism)
- Metaphilosophy
- Intuitions
- Theory choice
- Metaphysics (material constitution)
- Moral responsibility
- Normative ethics
- Philosophy of biology (fitness)
- Philosophy of language
- Demonstrative reference
- Intentions, presuppositions, etc.
- Frege
- Philosophy of law
- Political philosophy
- Ideal & nonideal theory
- Political representation
- Racism
- Virtue ethics
Thanks in advance to everyone who volunteers - I am very appreciative for your help!
Wow, no logic at all? That's rather sad. :(
Posted by: Sara L. Uckelman | 05/19/2017 at 07:25 AM
Formal epistemology is kind of 'logicish', right?
Posted by: Amanda | 05/19/2017 at 01:53 PM