Our books







Become a Fan

« Interview and Hiring Analysis | Main | Emotion Researcher »

03/23/2015

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Clayton

I tend to start with theory and move to the applied stuff. Usually start with a discussion of why death is bad for the one who dies to try to push students towards a kind of hedonism. Follow that with some attempts to convince them of consequentialism (focusing on Mill's proof of the principle of utility and some stuff inspired by Moore where I try to convince the students that consequentialism is analytic). A lot of this is set up for Foot and Thomson. I really enjoy trying to convince the students one week that consequentialism is analytic and then working through Foot and Thomson's attack(s) on the idea of the goodness property, so I'd assign 'Utilitarianism and the Virtues' along with a section from Thomson's -Normativity-. Once we get there, I introduce some non-consequentialist alternatives.

elisa freschi

Hi Marcus,
this is not my topic, but since you mentioned "Western", perhaps you can find some interesting suggestions about topics to be dealt with (and the primary sources and studies on them) in Indian ethical theories here:
http://indianphilosophyblog.org/2015/02/01/goodness-as-preventing-suffering/

And: http://indianphilosophyblog.org/2014/11/05/stephen-harris-on-suffering-and-buddhist-ethics/

Good luck!

Derek Bowman

As someone untrained in Chinese Philosophy, I found this anthology a useful introduction to a number of Chinese Philosophers, including their ethical views. Assigning the whole book would probably be overkill unless you wanted to make it a major focus, but I found the translation and background notes very accessible, and many of them would fit well with standard (and non-standard) issues that tend to be emphasized in Western philosophical ethics.

In addition to the more obvious 'virtue ethics' connections that are often highlighted, you have figures like Mozi who often sounds more like a utilitarian, some two millennia before Bentham.

I haven't yet used this text in class, but I have used it as part of my own background in teaching from an anthology of "World Philosophy." (also linked).

http://www.hackettpublishing.com/philosophy/readings-in-classical-chinese-philosophy

https://global.oup.com/academic/product/introduction-to-world-philosophy-9780195152319?cc=us&lang=en&

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Job-market reporting thread

Current Job-Market Discussion Thread

Philosophers in Industry Directory

Categories

Subscribe to the Cocoon