Our books

Become a Fan

« Analytic Philosophy, Continental Philosophy, and Natural Philosophy | Main | Unger's "Free Will and Scientificalism" »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


--I can't help but be struck by the fact that the areas of analytic philosophy that carry the greatest prestige -- analytic metaphysics, epistemology, philosophical logic, metaethics, etc. -- are almost to a "t" fields that are about as far as one can get from being relevant to everyday life. Even in ethics, the most prestigious area--metaethics--is concerned with entirely abstract questions about "moral facts.--

I'm not sure that this is true. Many *very* prestigious philosophers, it seems to me, do not work in these fields (or, at least, their main work is not in these fields). Just to name a few that are currently "top of their field": Martha Nussbaum, Amartya Sen, Anthony Appiah, Thomas Pogge, Peter Singer, Elizabeth Anderson, Shelly Kagan, Jeff McMahan. This group seems to rival, in terms of prestige, any group of Lemming (and metaethics) philosophers out there now.

Marcus Arvan

Hi Paul: of course you're right about that small class of individuals. But a select class of individuals is not a genuine counterexample to a *generalization*. So, for example, there are some very successful female CEOs of Fortune 500 companies--yet this is *no* evidence that women do not face discrimination in the workplace. The claims the person I paraphrased were meant to be be generalized, statistical claims. Do you mean to deny that the fields higher in the list are not *generally*, or on average, afforded greater prestige than those lower in the list?


Hi Marcus,

It seems to me that "prestigious" already picks out a relatively small class of philosophers. But maybe I'm wrong about this. Still, it doesn't seem obvious to me that your average, mid-career lemming philosopher is any more prestigious than your average, mid-career normative ethicist, say (neither seem to be very prestigious).

But perhaps certain *areas* are more prestigious than others, which is what the original post stated. Yet I'm not sure how to judge the prestige of an area apart from the philosophers that work in that area.

Anyway, I doubt that I have a very good pulse of the profession, as a whole.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Subscribe to the Cocoon

Job-market reporting thread

Current Job-Market Discussion Thread

Philosophers in Industry Directory


Subscribe to the Cocoon