Our books

Become a Fan

« Reader query on when to head on the job-market | Main | Morality, the Problem of Possible Future Selves, and Christmas Parables »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Michel X.

FWIW, a few places where I applied to teach a single course as a sessional (adjunct) last year wrote back to say that I didn't have enough teaching experience (1 course solo, and around 15 as a TA).

My impression, as a result, is that one or two no longer cuts it.


Let me sound a different note. I am not from a prestigious program and consequently have a *ton* of teaching experience. It has done me zero good on the market over the last half-decade. I have taught more than *40 courses as a sole instructor*. While doing so I've kept a pretty active publication schedule too--including a few papers in top 20 places. However, last year when I applied for a VAP that carried a 4/4 teaching load, I didn't even get an interview. They did, however, give an interview to a friend of mine who had taught exactly 1 course in his life (a course I also have taught), but had a fancy pedigree. (he had a few more publications than me, but not in better places). In the PFO letter, the school told me that I wasn't chosen for an interview, because they only wanted to interview people who had a lot of teaching experience, because it was a teaching heavy position.

Best part of the story is that my friend decided he didn't want to the gig and so didn't even do the interview.

I took two morals from this:

* Search committee members can be radically mistaken about which criteria they are actually using when they make hiring decisions.
* Prestige trumps everything else, even for teaching positions.


If you look at who got TT teaching positions last hiring season (and I looked at this closely), almost every hire at a non-elite teaching school went to someone with a PhD from an unranked institution (outside of Leiter top 50). Most of those hired had a few publications in third-tier journals, and very few had top 20 publications.

Sorry about your bad luck anonymous. The job market is often random and inexplicable. Your story is not representative though.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Job-market reporting thread

Current Job-Market Discussion Thread