« Job-Market Posts | Main | The Demarcation Problem »

09/05/2012

Comments

Mark Alfano

A colleague of mine explained what a typical teaching letter looks like:

Paragraph 1: Introduce the candidate. Mention how you know him/her. Mention which courses s/he's taught.

Paragraph 2: Describe the key elements of the candidate's quantitative student evaluations. E.g., she received 4.5 out of 5 on clarity from her students.

Paragraph 3: Describe the key elements of the candidate's qualitative student evaluations and mentor evaluations. E.g., students who take her class describe it as 'fascinating' and 'inspiring.' When she was observed by a member of the faculty, she blah blah blah. Tell an illuminating anecdote if possible.

Paragraph 4: Sum things up. Make a clear endorsement. E.g., she is sure to bring her pedagogical skill and enthusiasm to her next institution.

Of course, lots of letters deviate from this norm, but I think it's a perfectly acceptable way to go.

Kyle Whyte

Tuomas: Tough questions. I know others with similar circumstances. Here's my understanding of the purpose of the teaching portfolio. It's an expectation that there is absolutely no uniformity in the teaching experiences that candidates have had the opportunity to do. This both goes for folks coming from doctoral programs or fellowships where there was no teaching, to situations like you just described, where you're teaching, but there isn't the sort of robust data that you've probably heard other people include. Because there's an expectation of no uniformity, the teaching portfolio literally provides a minimum of evidence that you're competent as a teacher. Then, in an APA interview, and hopefully on campus, you will have to really sell your teaching. This being said, you should actually, in the right and most convenient place in your portfolio, indicate, straightforwardly and briefly, that in your university (or whatever the relevant context is), that evaluations are only "like such." You should add terms in that make it pretty obvious that students aren't required to submit evaluations. Writing this, in combination with what you report about your teaching experiences, should paint an accurate picture of where you're coming from, and application readers will simply be looking to see whether you display the appropriate evidence for competence given what you're working with. This may also mean that application readers place more emphasis on the other elements of your teaching portfolio. But if, for a certain job, you fit the AOS/AOC and your other materials are right on, the teaching portfolio really just confirms that based on whatever you can realistically compile from the opportunities to teach you've had, you're competent. Tuomas, and everyone else, does this sound right? Or am I not getting the purpose of the teaching portfolio right?

Kyle Whyte

Tuomas: I ran into a somewhat similar situation when I had observation reports from one school but not another. In the cover page for my teaching portfolio, I did something like this:

Teaching Portfolio

I have included the most recent observations and student evaluations, which are from X (last year) and Y. For X, there is no observation report because I was not observed.


Table of Contents

1. Teaching Statement

2. List of Courses Taught

3. Student Evaluations from X

4. Observations and Student Evaluations from Y

5. Syllabai for X and Y.

* Teaching Recommendation Bundled with Other Letters of Recommendation

Tuomas

Thanks for the helpful comments Mark and Kyle. I guess I shouldn't worry too much about the format of the teaching letter, especially since -- like Kyle suggests -- its role is likely to be relatively small. Good points about explaining the situation in the teaching statement as well.

More generally, I find that applicants are required to submit much more material in the US than in the UK or elsewhere in Europe. In the UK for instance it's typical that one is only required to submit a CV, cover letter, and a writing sample, with two recommendation letters. No separate teaching/research statements etc.

Becky

Assuming you include a portfolio (summary of evaluations scores, possibly the raw data, actual syllabi, teaching statement, etc.), is it really necessary to have a teaching letter if you're an applicant who is already in a TT job? If so, who's supposed to write it -- your colleague/chair whom you'd rather not tell you're fishing (or at least not involve in baiting the hook)?

Kyle Whyte

Tuomas: I find too within the U.S. that there are some people who provide more information than others, and there are better or worse ways of doing that, as well. People that provide the minimum materials can certainly be very successful on the market. So it just depends on the individual. I'm still curious whether others agree with my sentiments about the importance of the teaching materials in applications. Did I diminish it too much?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.